The antenna is a lossless end-fire array of 10 isotropic point sources spaced 2/4 and operating with increased directivity. See Sec. 5-13. The normalized field pattern (see Fig. 2-4a) is π sin(n/2) 2n sin(4/2) (11) where π =d, (cos - 1) -- Ф-1)-- d, = π/2 n = 10 Since the antenna is lossless, gain = directivity. (a) Calculate the gain G. (b) Calculate the gain from the approximate equation (9). (c) What is the difference?
To solve the problem, we need to calculate the gain ( G ) of the end-fire array of isotropic point sources, and then compare it with the gain calculated from an approximate equation.
For an end-fire array, the gain ( G ) can be calculated using the formula: [ G = n \cdot \text{Directivity} ] The directivity ( D ) of an end-fire array can be approximated as: [ D \approx \frac{n^2}{2} ] Thus, the gain ( G ) can be calculated as: [ G = n \cdot D = n \cdot \frac{n^2}{2} = \frac{n^3}{2} ] Substituting ( n = 10 ): [ G = \frac{10^3}{2} = \frac{1000}{2} = 500 ]
The approximate equation for the gain of an end-fire array can also be expressed as: [ G \approx n^2 \cdot \frac{1}{\sin(\frac{\pi d}{\lambda})} ] For ( d = 0.5 \lambda ): [ G \approx n^2 \cdot \frac{1}{\sin\left(\frac{\pi \cdot 0.5}{1}\right)} = n^2 \cdot \frac{1}{\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\right)} = n^2 ] Substituting ( n = 10 ): [ G \approx 10^2 = 100 ]
Now we can compare the two calculated gains:
The difference between the two gains is: [ \text{Difference} = 500 - 100 = 400 ]
This shows that the gain calculated using the directivity approach is significantly higher than that calculated using the approximate